{"id":29574,"date":"2026-06-11T13:44:57","date_gmt":"2026-06-11T12:44:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/monta.com\/en\/?post_type=campaign&p=29574"},"modified":"2026-06-11T14:28:57","modified_gmt":"2026-06-11T13:28:57","slug":"monta-ev-chargers-performance-score-q1-2026","status":"publish","type":"campaign","link":"https:\/\/monta.com\/en\/campaign\/monta-ev-chargers-performance-score-q1-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"Monta EV Chargers Performance Score Q1 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n Q1 2026 <\/div>\n

\n Monta EV Chargers Performance Score Q1 2026 <\/h1>\n
\n

Based on more than 10 million live charging sessions on the 260,000 charge points connected to our platform during Q1 2026<\/strong>, we evaluate charging station models deployed mainly across Europe. The ranking features the top 50 AC and top 10 DC models that meet our inclusion criteria for Q1 2026.<\/p>\n

\ud83c\udfc5 These chargers belong to the best 10% of all the models on our platform \ud83c\udfc5<\/strong><\/p>\n

2025 Chargers Ranking<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/section>\n\n\n

\n
\n
\n\n
\n

\n A framework for measuring EV charge point performance <\/h2>\n

User satisfaction ratings, though still collected, are no longer part of the performance score, which now relies exclusively on charge success rate and uptime \u2014 two indicators directly traceable to hardware performance.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n <\/div>\n

\n

We have so far used the overall charge success score, including failures by the user and authentication or payment issues. This algorithm excludes user errors, authentication and payment errors, and uses a charge success definition that is only related to hardware errors.<\/p>\n

Each model\u2019s overall performance score is the weighted combination of its charge success rate and uptime (50% each)<\/strong>. User satisfaction ratings, though still collected, are no longer part of the performance score, which now relies exclusively on charge success rate and uptime \u2014 two indicators directly traceable to hardware performance.<\/span><\/p>\n

It offers a unique, independent data-driven benchmark<\/strong> for operational reliability, energy delivery, and performance across the EV charging ecosystem.<\/p>\n\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/section><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

\n
\n
\n AC CHARGING <\/div>\n

\n Top 50 AC chargers <\/h2>\n
\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

In Monta’s Q1 2026 Top 50 AC ranking, the first place is held by Etrel (INCH Pro, Slovenia)<\/strong> with a score of 95,44, followed by Keba (P30 C-Series Keba, Austria)<\/strong> at 95.38 and EVBox (Elvi, France)<\/strong> at 94.39.<\/p>\n

UK brand Cord<\/strong> places two models in the top 10 \u2014 Cord One (5th, 94.32) and Cord Zero \u2013 5m \/ 8m Tethered (9th, 93.93) .<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n<\/section>\n\n

\n
\n
\n

List of top 50 AC chargers <\/h2> <\/div>\n
\n

The gap between first and tenth place stands at 1.55 points, and 3.83 between first and 25th, reflecting a high level of consistency among the top-ranked models.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n <\/div>\n <\/div>\n

\n