Monta is committed to offering complete transparency by providing real-world charging and usage statistics. We evaluate all chargers in our network on a set of important criteria, including popularity, stability, and user rating.
Popularity
The popularity of a charger among EV drivers is a good indicator of its quality and reliability. Therefore, assessing a charger's demand among EV users can provide insight into its reputation and performance.
We calculate the score based on the amount of chargers of the same model compared to the number of units of other models, and the score is weighted based on current type and the number of installations for that particular model in last 14 days. For popularity, Wallbox Pulsar scored 7%.
Charging stability
Charging stability is crucial for an optimal EV charging experience. When a charger doesn't perform as expected, it negatively impacts the entire charging experience. We calculate the failed against successful charges across the selected model and mix it with the time the charge point was available or charging, and compare it against disconnected chargers, or chargers in error state.
Given its importance, we assign more weight to this metric in our algorithm for calculating the final score. As a result, charging stability is a significant ranking factor for classifying chargers in our supported hardware list. Wallbox Pulsar scored 59% for charging stability.
User rating
Monta users can rate and leave reviews for the charge point models that were used on the Monta platform. If a user owns or uses a public charge point, they can share their experiences and thoughts about the performance of that charge point.
User rating is calculated as a % vs highest in the market. For this metric, the Pulsar model scored 53%.
Cable Lock
AutoSmartCharge
